One Sentence Changes the Entire Regulatory Framework
The formula stays the same. The bottle stays the same. But write a single word on the label — "antibacterial" — and the product instantly moves into a different legal domain. From the notification logic of cosmetics legislation to the authorisation logic of biocidal products legislation. This transition is silent; nobody warns you. The warning arrives in the form of an inspection report.
In Turkey, the logic of the distinction is clear: a cosmetic product cleans, beautifies, or imparts a scent; a biocidal product destroys, repels, renders harmless, or exerts a controlling effect on a harmful organism. The definition of a biocidal product covers substances or mixtures containing one or more active substances, used to destroy, repel, render harmless, or prevent the action of any harmful organism by means other than purely physical or mechanical action.
The critical word here is "purpose". And what determines purpose is not the molecule inside the product, but your claim. The label, the brochure, the product name, advertising copy — even a social media post. A public notice issued by the Ministry of Health years ago establishes this principle explicitly: products such as soap, hand-washing liquid, and hand-sanitising gel fall within the scope of cosmetics, but if the word "antibacterial" appears on their packaging, in their advertising, or in their promotional materials, they are treated as biocidal products.
In other words, there are not two separate worlds; there is a single threshold. What crosses that threshold is not the formula — it is the sentence.
Common mistake: "It already contains alcohol, it kills bacteria anyway — what's the harm in saying so?" What the molecule does and what you claim on the label are two separate legal events. A cologne containing alcohol but making no hygiene claim is a cosmetic; the moment you call that same liquid a "hand antiseptic", you enter the biocidal regime.
A division has also been established on the institutional side. Biocidal products that come into direct contact with the human body (Product Type 1 and Product Type 19) have been placed under the authority, jurisdiction, and responsibility of the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency (TİTCK). For other product types, the competent authority handling the process is the Ministry of Health's General Directorate of Public Health. Accordingly, even the answer to the question "which door do I knock on?" depends on the sentence you have written.
This article explains the cost of that sentence. And how to describe your product without incurring that cost.
From Claim to Product Type: Map It Out
Biocidal legislation classifies products not by name but by intended purpose. These categories are referred to in the industry as PT (Product Type). Which PT your product falls into determines what tests you must commission, which authority you must apply to, and how heavy your dossier will be.
Biocidal products are divided into four main groups and twenty-two product types according to their area of use and purpose. The section relevant to fragrance oil and cosmetic manufacturers is almost entirely the first main group: within the disinfectants main group, Product Type 1 covers biocidal products for human hygiene; Product Type 2 covers disinfectants for personal and public areas; Product Type 3 covers veterinary hygiene; and Product Type 4 covers disinfectants used in food and feed areas.
The table below matches the scenarios most frequently confused in practice. Read it not by asking "what is my product?" but by asking "what does the label say?"
| Expression on label/in promotional materials | Perceived purpose of the product | Applicable regime | Competent authority |
|---|---|---|---|
| "Refreshing hand gel", "moisturising hand cream" | Cleansing / care | Cosmetic (product notification + safety assessment) | TİTCK – Cosmetics |
| "Antibacterial hand gel", "hand and skin antiseptic", "disinfectant soap" | Microorganism control on skin | Biocidal – PT 1 (human hygiene) | TİTCK – Biocidal |
| "Kills 99.9% of germs on surfaces" (desk, bathroom, kitchen) | Surface disinfection | Biocidal – PT 2 (disinfectant for personal/public areas) | HSGM |
| "Food preparation surface disinfectant" | Food area hygiene | Biocidal – PT 4 | HSGM |
| "Mosquito-repellent spray", "tick repellent" | Repelling / deterring | Biocidal – PT 19 (repellents and attractants) | TİTCK – Biocidal |
| "Room spray – refreshes the environment, masks unpleasant odours" | Scent delivery | Non-cosmetic consumer product / general product safety | General legislation |
| "Room spray – destroys bacteria in the air" | Air/environment disinfection | Biocidal (PT 2 depending on air/surface claim) | HSGM |
Note: do not read the table as "room sprays are cosmetics". Room fragrances are not applied to the human body, so in most cases they do not fall within the cosmetic definition either — they are neither cosmetic nor biocidal and are subject to general product safety legislation. However, the moment the phrase "kills germs" is added, the product shifts directly into the disinfectant category.
For hand products, the dividing line is sharpened by rinse-off behaviour. In a hygienic liquid soap that is rinsed off and removes dirt, the cleansing function is primary; marketing a leave-on hand gel as "antiseptic", "disinfectant", or a product that destroys specific microorganisms points to a biocidal purpose. TİTCK's borderline product guidance presses the same point: for leave-on products marketed as antiseptic or antibacterial, biocidal claims framed as a secondary function must be regulated with both sets of legislation taken into account.
Tip: Write your label text before formulating the product idea. Once you have the text, ask yourself one question: "Does this sentence make a promise to destroy, repel, or control an organism?" If yes, add the authorisation line item to your budget. If no, stay on the cosmetics track — and keep that consistency throughout every part of the label.
Label Language: Which Sentence Takes You Where
Regulatory texts can feel abstract. What happens in practice is very concrete: one line of text, one inspection report, one fine. That is why label language must be constructed word by word.
First, let us clear up a misconception: once you have obtained biocidal authorisation, you still cannot "write whatever you like". The rule introduced by the regulatory amendment is unambiguous: all information on the label specimen approved by the Ministry must appear on the label of the finished product, and no claims or statements outside the scope of the Regulation may be included in the approved label specimen. Placement of a QR code on the label for traceability purposes has also been mandated. The advertising side is equally restricted: no verbal, written, or visual publication may be made for the purpose of promoting a biocidal product that contradicts the information on its approved label or that could cause misinterpretation or misuse.
Then there is the numbers issue. The sentence "kills 99.9% of germs" is not a marketing embellishment — it is a measurable efficacy claim and must be backed by laboratory data. Efficacy is the ability of a product to produce the claimed effect on target organisms when actually used under the conditions of use declared on its label specimens; efficacy tests are the tests that an applicant must submit to demonstrate this.
| Risky expression | Why it is risky | Safer alternative |
|---|---|---|
| "Antibacterial liquid soap" | The product name itself constitutes a biocidal purpose claim | "Hygienically effective cleansing liquid soap" — tie the hygiene feel to the cleansing function |
| "Destroys 99.9% of germs" | Quantitative efficacy claim; triggers test data + approved label requirement | If you have no test data, do not quote figures; stay in the language of "for your daily cleansing routine" |
| "Protects against viruses" | A virucidal claim requires a separate efficacy standard | Do not use on an unlicensed product at all |
| "Contains natural antibacterial tea tree oil" | The word "natural" does not make the claim innocuous; it is still a biocidal claim | Describe the ingredient as a fragrance/sensory contributor |
| "Room spray that purifies the environment of germs" | Air/surface disinfection promise | Stay within the "ambient scent" function |
| "Hospital-grade disinfecting power" | Comparative efficacy claim; same burden of proof applies | Do not draw such comparisons |
So what do the tests actually look like? The most widely referenced method for bactericidal efficacy is TS EN 1276. The TS EN 1276 method is generally applied in antibacterial efficacy testing and tests take approximately 10–15 days. The threshold is demanding: products are expected to demonstrate a reduction of at least 5 log₁₀ (i.e., a kill rate of 99.999%) against all four test organisms within the specified contact time. For hand hygiene, the conditions are defined in the TİTCK guideline by product and area of use; for example, bactericidal efficacy for a hygienic hand-wash disinfectant is assessed using TS EN 1276 at 20 °C with a 60-second contact time against strains of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and E. hirae.
The rationale behind the 99.9% figure commonly seen in the market for rinse-off products is the same: products that are found to be at least 99.9% effective against bacteria in tests may include expressions such as "destroys 99.9% of bacteria" on their packaging. In short, the number comes from the report, not from the marketing department. No report, no number.
Enforcement is real: During a six-month inspection period, TİTCK examined 44 biocidal products, found 5 to be risky and 3 to be non-compliant, and imposed a total administrative fine of 1,633,572 TRY on the companies concerned; items subject to action included antimicrobial hand and skin sprays, antibacterial hair-washing bonnets, and bar soaps. On the Agency's unsafe product lists, the grounds column is most frequently recorded as a breach of Article 7, first paragraph, subparagraph (a) of Law No. 7223 — i.e. supply without authorisation/permission. These lists are publicly available; for brand reputation, they are more costly than the fine itself.
If You Have Chosen the Authorisation Route: A Step-by-Step Process
Some products simply have to be biocidal; if you are selling a hand antiseptic, there is no way around it. In that case, structure the process correctly from the outset. The flow below represents the logical sequence of the dossier — the document list required by the authority should always be verified from the current official source.
- Lock in the product type (PT) and the claim
Clarify the label claim first, then determine the PT. Establish what purpose your product serves and what your label claims are; decide whether it is Type 1 or Type 18. Incorrectly determining the product type leads to rejection at the very first stage of the process; you must also verify that the active substance appears on the approved active substances list.
- Verify the active substance
The active substance is the heart of a biocidal dossier — ethanol, propan-2-ol, benzalkonium chloride, chlorhexidine digluconate, and so on. Whether the active substance is listed for the relevant product type determines which provision of the application rules will apply to your submission. For products containing an existing active substance not included on the lists, an application must be made in accordance with Article 14 of the Regulation.
- Plan the efficacy tests
Select the standard appropriate to the area of use and contact time. EN 1276 for bacteria, EN 13697 for surfaces, EN 14476 for virucidal claims, and so on. EN 13697 is used for biocidal surface efficacy testing; EN 14476 is used to determine efficacy against viruses. The test must validate the contact time and dose stated on the label; if the label and test conditions do not match, the dossier will be returned.
- Commission physical-chemical and stability analyses
Active substance assay, pH, appearance, stability. It is a fundamental requirement that the analyses underpinning the authorisation, as specified in the Regulation, be carried out in competent laboratories within the scope of TS EN ISO/IEC 17025. Guidance documents are updated: the General Directorate of Public Health's Department of Environmental Health published an updated "Analysis Guide for Physical, Chemical and Stability Tests of Biocidal Products" on 2 July 2026.
- Have the risk assessment dossier prepared
Risk Assessment Reports must be prepared in accordance with Annex VI of the Biocidal Products Regulation and kept up to date. This is a separate and generally more demanding exercise than the safety assessment required for cosmetics.
- Submit the label specimen for approval
The label is part of the authorisation. The product's trade name, the name and address of the authorisation holder, the name and concentration in metric units of each active substance, the authorisation number granted in Turkey, and the dosage and instructions for use for each application must appear on the label in clear, indelible Turkish. Label format announcements change: a "Biocidal Products Label Format" notice published on 23 January 2026 set out the updates required to labels.
- Establish your fee and cost plan
The authorisation process is not free; analyses, consultancy, and official fees are separate line items. The Ministry publishes a current price guide containing all fees charged during the authorisation process, and a 2026 biocidal price guide and analysis information guide has also been announced. Verify the amounts from the official tariff before each application.
- Schedule your post-authorisation obligations
Do not assume the authorisation is indefinite. Pursuant to Article 8, second paragraph, subparagraph (c), an authorisation granted under this provision is valid for six years. In addition, it has been stipulated that a newly authorised or renewed product must be inspected at least once during the period of validity of the authorisation, with a sample taken and physical and chemical analyses carried out.
There is also the production line itself to consider. Alcohol-based hand antiseptics and room fragrance solvents (DPM, MMB, and similar glycol ethers) are highly flammable; their flash points are low. When working with high-grade ethanol, avoid plastic containers and clothing that accumulate static electricity, take earthing and ventilation seriously, and wear gloves and eye protection. Storage capacity, fire classification, and licensed manufacturing site conditions are issues that must be resolved before the biocidal dossier.
On the raw materials side, two parallel tracks also apply: chemical registration/notification obligations under KKDİK, and IFRA compliance declarations for fragrance oils. Bear in mind that IFRA limits are determined not by the overall fragrance oil percentage but by individual substances within the fragrance oil and by the product category (rinse-off/leave-on) — the generalisation that "any fragrance oil is safe up to a certain percentage" is incorrect. Request an IFRA certificate, a Safety Data Sheet (SDS), and an allergen list from your supplier.
Practical framework: If you do not want to enter the biocidal route, apply three rules together. One: make no hygiene promise in the product. Two: use no microbiological term prefixed with "anti-" in the product name. Three: give your marketing team the same vocabulary — if the label is clean but the advertising copy is not, the outcome is no different.
Frequently Asked Questions
The questions most frequently received from prospective manufacturers and sellers. Brief answers — each capable of preventing an inspection fine.
What happens if I write "kills bacteria in the air" on my room spray?
Can I sell antibacterial liquid soap with just a ÜTS notification?
Which test is required to use the claim "kills 99.9% of germs"?
Hand antiseptic, antibacterial gel, disinfectant — what is the difference?
Is cologne considered antibacterial? Does 80-proof cologne count as a disinfectant?
My formula contains tea tree oil — can I call it "naturally antibacterial"?
Is biocidal authorisation free, and how long does it take?
I did not write it on the label, but I said "it kills germs" on Instagram — is that a problem?
Does a CE/EU authorisation for an imported product apply in Turkey?
Can I sell the same product as both a cosmetic and a biocidal?
If I set the alcohol concentration in a hand gel to 70%, is efficacy automatically guaranteed?
I want to produce a disinfectant for kitchen/food areas — can I use a fragrance oil?
Can I say "strengthens immunity, kills germs" on my aromatherapy spray?
Final word: Biocidal legislation is a living text; regulatory annexes, label formats, and analysis guides are updated throughout the year. This article provides a framework — it does not make decisions. Before placing your product on the market, verify the current legislation and application requirements from the official sources of TİTCK and the Ministry of Health's General Directorate of Public Health; if in doubt, request a classification opinion from the authority. You design the formula; legislation draws the boundary. The rest is your signature.
Related Articles
What Are IFRA Standards and How Do They Affect Your Product?
The impact of IFRA categories and usage limits on manufacturer responsibility. An authoritative, trust-building article.
Read →What You Need to Know About Fragrance Oil Trade Under KKDİK
The impact of Turkey's chemicals legislation on fragrance oil commerce; builds confidence with B2B buyers and attracts corporate clients.
Read →ÜTS (Product Tracking System) Registration: What to Do Before Selling Cosmetic Fragrances
Notification and registration of cosmetic products in TİTCK's Product Tracking System before placing them on the market in Turkey; responsible person, product
Read →